• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 10:14:04 -0800
• References: <3C58F0CA.C6D43D92@r...> <3C58F0CA.C6D43D92@r...> <NCBBKFMJCLIMOBIGKFMJMEAIHCAA.ldodds@i...> <200201301936.g0UJaOj12628@d...> <5.1.0.14.2.20020131165520.00a7ece8@p...>

Sean McGrath wrote:
> 
>...
> 
> I'd be interested to know how much of this functionality is
> available today in various humble, unassuming, non-meta-infused
> tools like XML::Twig for example or XPath based mapping
> systems.

XPath mapping systems are typically not good at streaming.

XML::Twig is software, not a standard. You can't really expect to
distribute "XML::Twig specifications" to anyone using your vocabulary.
For one thing, they would have to worry about viruses.

 Paul Prescod

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
    • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
  • Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
    • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>

• References:
  • Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
  • Co-operating with Architectural Forms
    • From: "Leigh Dodds" <ldodds@i...>
  • Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
  • Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
    • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
• Next by Date: Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
• Previous by thread: Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
• Next by thread: Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread