• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 12:59:59 -0500
• In-reply-to: <m38zaetokm.fsf@l...>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020131083303.02814c60@p...> <m38zaetokm.fsf@l...>

On Thursday 31 January 2002 12:31 pm, Lars Marius Garshol wrote:
> This I don't follow. How would you have gotten the processing
> semantics and resulting naming freedom by taking that approach?

How do you get them withgout AF's?

• References:
  • RE: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
    • From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@g...>

• Prev by Date: Advice on parsing approach/tools?
• Next by Date: Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
• Previous by thread: Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
• Next by thread: Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread