[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: misprocessing namespaces (was Re: There isa mean

• To: Al Snell <alaric@a...>
• Subject: Re: misprocessing namespaces (was Re: There isa meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: 30 Jan 2002 13:02:33 -0500
• Cc: The Deviants <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0201301645170.9660-100000@l...>
• References: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0201301645170.9660-100000@l...>

On Wed, 2002-01-30 at 11:51, Al Snell wrote:
> Like this:
> 
> <http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml:html>
> ...
> </http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml:html>

Weirder, actually. Like:
<test http://foo.com/bar/baz="value" />

Dunno.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: misprocessing namespaces (was Re: There is ameaning, but it's not in the data alone)
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• References:
  • Re: misprocessing namespaces (was Re: There isa meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
    • From: Al Snell <alaric@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: misprocessing namespaces (was Re: There isa meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
• Next by Date: RE: RE: Auto-completion in editors
• Previous by thread: Re: misprocessing namespaces (was Re: There isa meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
• Next by thread: Re: misprocessing namespaces (was Re: There is ameaning, but it's not in the data alone)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread