[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: misprocessing namespaces (was Re: There isa mean

• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: Re: misprocessing namespaces (was Re: There isa meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
• From: Al Snell <alaric@a...>
• Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 16:51:32 +0000 (GMT)
• Cc: The Deviants <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <1012412817.1809.1077.camel@l...>

On 30 Jan 2002, Simon St.Laurent wrote:

> Yesterday someone asked if you could skip the namespace declarations for
> attributes and just use the URI.  I still haven't figured out what
> exactly that meant, but think I set them straight.

Like this:

<http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml:html>

...

</http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml:html>

:-)

ABS

-- 
                               Alaric B. Snell
 http://www.alaric-snell.com/  http://RFC.net/  http://www.warhead.org.uk/
   Any sufficiently advanced technology can be emulated in software

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: misprocessing namespaces (was Re: There isa meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • misprocessing namespaces (was Re: There is a meaning, butit's not in the data alone)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Namespaces in XML and schemas
• Next by Date: Re: misprocessing namespaces (was Re: There isa meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
• Previous by thread: misprocessing namespaces (was Re: There is a meaning, butit's not in the data alone)
• Next by thread: Re: misprocessing namespaces (was Re: There isa meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread