• To: <xml-dev@l...>,"Takahide Muramoto" <murah@f...>
• Subject: Re: Question about the erratum E15
• From: "Rob Lugt" <roblugt@e...>
• Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 10:10:25 -0000
• References: <4.3.1-J.20020123145942.0325de20@p...>

Takahide Muramoto <murah@f...> wrote



> I have a question about E15 in XML 1.0 Second Edition Specification
> Errata.
>
> I don't know whether correctly I understood the second sentence of
> the numbered paragraph 2 in the Element valid VC ; "Note that a
> CDATA section ..."
>

Hi Takahide,

All your examples contained CDATA sections between the <sec> element and the
first child element.  Your content model for <sec> specifies element-only
content.

The clarification that E15 is making (as I understand it) is that CDATA
sections can never be treated as the S production, and can therefore never
validly appear within element-only content.  Therefore I believe all your
examples are invalid.

This seems quite clear to me, but perhaps a member of the XML Core WG would
like to comment?

Regards
~Rob

--
Rob Lugt
ElCel Technology
http://www.elcel.com

• References:
  • Question about the erratum E15
    • From: Takahide Muramoto <murah@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RDDL and document types was : Re: The task to be solved by RDDL.
• Next by Date: Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• Previous by thread: Question about the erratum E15
• Next by thread: Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread