Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Jonathan Borden wrote: > Although this is outside the scope of the current RDDL specification, you > make a persuasive argument that the functionality is desirable, and I do > believe RDDL can assist with an acceptable solution. I agree. As you point out, what is needed is linking to a RDDL document for a particular document type, rather than a particular namespace. I think one of the things that was confusing me was that when people defined the purpose of RDDL, they said that it was to provide information / resources about the elements in a particular namespace. But when they gave examples, it was always with respect to an instance document that might have elements from multiple namespaces. While the information about a particular namespace is useful at design time, it often lacks the context (as when an element occurs in a larger document) to be useful at run time. -- Ron
|
