• To: "Jeff Lowery" <jlowery@s...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: URI intents? (was: RDDL: Negotiate out the Noise)
• From: "Leigh Dodds" <ldodds@i...>
• Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 21:22:10 -0000
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <3549BAFD79A7D411A1CF00508B62B5BC0124BA04@e...>

> It seems that the basic problem is not what URIs point too, but that they
> are being overloaded (points to a web page, identifies a namespace, points
> to resource definition, etc, etc.)
> 
> Should URI's be extended to include intent?

Isn't this what xlink:role and xlink:arcrole are already providing? Hence 
RDDL 'nature' and 'purpose'.

Cheers,

L.

• References:
  • RE: URI intents? (was: RDDL: Negotiate out the Noise)
    • From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: URI intents? (was: RDDL: Negotiate out the Noise)
• Next by Date: Re: RDDL (was RE: Negotiate Out The Noise)
• Previous by thread: Re: URI intents? (was: RDDL: Negotiate out the Noise)
• Next by thread: RE: URI intents? (was: RDDL: Negotiate out the Noise)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread