Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Jeff Lowery wrote: > > Should URI's be extended to include intent? I realize this opens its own can > of worms, but I'm see worms already... maybe this can is more tractable. At > least an URI that is used outside of its intent could be clearly called evil > usage. URIs with multiple intents would have to be spelled out using the > same base URI identifier, redeclared for each intent. Ok, so let's describe the intent of how a resource is to be used, let's call that a "purpose" and sometimes different systems will need different forms of a resource, let's call that a "nature". So if we label a resource, by "nature" and "purpose", we will have a mechanism where a system can pick a resource according to what it needs to do with it. > > Is that to far whacked out an idea? Perhaps my own intent is unclear... > I think it would work. Jonathan
|
