• To: 'Jeff Lowery' <jlowery@s...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 14:33:10 -0600

Too late, but zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

len the troll beneath the bridge between two worlds

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Lowery [mailto:jlowery@s...]

Let's not forget, also, that the implementation of the physical model
validates the assumptions of the conceptual model. 

But I think that's off-topic. I don't want to get Len revved up ;-)

• Prev by Date: RE: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• Next by Date: XML-RPC question
• Previous by thread: RE: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• Next by thread: RE: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread