• To: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <clbullar@i...>,"'Jeff Lowery'" <jlowery@s...>
• Subject: RE: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• From: "Michael Fitzgerald" <mike@w...>
• Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 15:09:38 -0800
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306DF62FA@HQ5>

Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
>For schemas, nyet.  But for the Schema Definition
>language itself, da.  I don't know what RELAX NG
>is using for this. Anyone?

Here is a good explanation of what RELAX NG is /not/ doing about associating
schemas with documents and why:

http://thaiopensource.com/relaxng/design.html#section:17

It is from James Clark's paper "The Design of RELAX NG."

Mike

• References:
  • RE: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Taxonomies?
• Next by Date: RE: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
• Previous by thread: Re: Taxonomies?
• Next by thread: RE: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread