[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
David Brownell wrote: > If the intent was to be XSLT-specific, the package names should > have been "javax.xml.xslt.*" ... :) I can't say I disagree. Evan
|
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
David Brownell wrote: > If the intent was to be XSLT-specific, the package names should > have been "javax.xml.xslt.*" ... :) I can't say I disagree. Evan
|