[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


I can see implementing the output properties without requiring
XSLT, however.

If the intent was to be XSLT-specific, the package names should
have been "javax.xml.xslt.*" ... :)

- Dave


----- Original Message -----
From: "Evan D. Lenz" <elenz@x...>
To: "David Brownell" <david-b@p...>; "Evan D. Lenz" <elenz@x...>; "Elliotte Rusty
Harold" <elharo@m...>; <michael.h.kay@n...>; <xml-dev@l...>
Cc: <xml-interest@j...>
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 1:11 PM
Subject: RE:  JAXP's ID Transform failing to includenamespacedeclaration attributes


> David Brownell wrote:
> > The javadoc doesn't constrain Transformer objects to support only
> > XSLT ... it appears to take some care to avoid linking to XSLT.
>
> To what extent that care is intentional, I think it's misplaced. There's no
> getting away from the XSLT-specific nature of getOutputProperties() and
> other methods and attributes of the Transformer class and fellow classes and
> interfaces in the java.xml.transform package. Indeed, the specification
> makes normative reference to the XSLT recommendation in the description of
> individual methods and properties, if not in the general description of
> Transformer.
>
> Evan
>


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member