• To: The Deviants <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: misprocessing namespaces (was Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 10:31:10 -0800
• In-reply-to: <NLV87ECHQ4Y1XRSQRPGCZXVPONDA.3c5832c7@MChamp>
• References: <1012413754.1809.1083.camel@l...>

At 12:52 PM 30/01/02 -0500, Mike Champion wrote:
>>Weirder, actually. Like:
>><test http://foo.com/bar/baz="value" />
>
>What's weird about that (other than the http:// ...and all the 
>baggage that drags along with it)?  I thought terseness was not a 
>consideration for XML?  

Allowing "/" as a name-char will certainly complicate parsers.

Aside from that, it's certainly admirably simple. -Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: misprocessing namespaces (was Re: There isa meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: misprocessing namespaces (was Re: There isa meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: misprocessing namespaces (was Re: There is ameaning, but it's not in the data alone)
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• Prev by Date: Re: misprocessing namespaces (was Re: There is ameaning, but it's not in the data alone)
• Next by Date: Re: misprocessing namespaces (was Re: There isa meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
• Previous by thread: Re: misprocessing namespaces (was Re: There is ameaning, but it's not in the data alone)
• Next by thread: Re: misprocessing namespaces (was Re: There isa meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread