|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XSLT and XQuery
> > I would be inclined > > to nominate some of the axes (almost everything but children and > > descendants) as the prime things to exclude from XQuery, both > > because they > > are hard to optimize and hard to statically type in any sort > > of useful way. > > Now I can reverse the argument: surely most of the axes are just syntactic > sugar for a recursive function call? And using the ancestor axis (for > example) explicitly is surely both more convenient for the user, and easier > to optimize, than a recursive call on a getParent() function? I would exclude the parent axis as well as the ancestor. It doesn't make much sense to me to include parent, child, descendant but exclude ancestor. > Also, I've never understood why the descendant axis is supposedly easier to > statically type than the ancestor axis. Because the child axis is easier to statically type that the parent axis. The type of an element (in the XDuce/XQuery sense) tells you the possible attributes and children but doesn't tell you the possible parents. Maybe you could do a type system that would tell you about the parents as well, but I suspect you would get a combinatorial explosion if your type system attempts to deal with both parents and children. James
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








