|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: XSLT and XQuery
> > Also, I've never understood why the descendant axis is > supposedly easier to > > statically type than the ancestor axis. > > Because the child axis is easier to statically type that the > parent axis. > The type of an element (in the XDuce/XQuery sense) tells you > the possible > attributes and children but doesn't tell you the possible > parents. Well, there are two possible scenarios. In a closed world, we know all the types, in which case the type of the parent is the union of all types that have "this" as a possible child or attribute. In an open world, we don't know all the types, so the type of the parent is "any element or document node". The only difficulty I can see is that of deciding whether the world should be open or closed. In any case, as a user, I'd much rather have a weakly-typed parent axis than no parent axis at all. I want to find all <section> elements whose depth in the tree is less than 4: //section[count(ancestor::* < 3)] You're not going to let me write that because you don't know how to type-check it? Gee thanks, I'll stick with XPath. Mike Kay
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








