• To: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
• Subject: Re: [Sax-devel] SAX2 r2 ... last call!
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: 10 Jan 2002 17:01:19 -0500
• Cc: sax-devel@l..., xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <1ee701c19a17$c3653640$6800000a@b...>
• References: <1ee701c19a17$c3653640$6800000a@b...>

On Thu, 2002-01-10 at 15:45, David Brownell wrote:
> It's been a couple months since the SAX2 r2pre3 release
> went out, and the only issues that have come up have been
> requests for minor doc clarifications.
> 
> Seems to me that it's time to put this release out!  Unless
> someone reports a significant bug in the next few days,
> I soon be finalizing this release, including the javadoc
> updates that are now in CVS.
> 
> Reminder:  The goal of this release is just bugfixes, which
> include doc/spec clarifications.  It should just "drop in" to
> existing environments.

It might be worth noting the current discussion on xml-dev (or content
thereof) regarding surrogate pairs, as SAX relies on the Java char and
String constructs throughout. I'd qualify this as a minor documentation
fix, as it only matters should SAX2 processors have to deal with XML
1.1.

Surrogate pairs and Java - what a yucky combination!

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [Sax-devel] SAX2 r2 ... last call!
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: [Sax-devel] SAX2 r2 ... last call!
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• References:
  • SAX2 r2 ... last call!
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Another strong/loose decision tree node (was Re: Interesting XML-DIST-APP thread)
• Next by Date: RE: Web Services Best Practice (was: Interesting XML-DIST-APP thread)
• Previous by thread: SAX2 r2 ... last call!
• Next by thread: Re: [Sax-devel] SAX2 r2 ... last call!
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread