• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: SV: SV: XML=WAP? And DOA?
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 14:08:10 -0500
• In-reply-to: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306DF6256@HQ5>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306DF6256@HQ5>

On Tuesday 15 January 2002 01:51 pm, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> Gad, Gavin, it seems that all we are saying is what we have said for
> years and years: don't confuse XML with applications of XML.  XML
> Doesn't DO Anything.  

Yes... perhaps we're like those fellows in the 1930's that still 
believed in "the ether" ;-)

> Let's see which app gets the best part of the cookie:  WebCGM or
> SVG.

I'm picking there's going to be a great business in the future in 
trying to figure out what to *do* with all this XML data....

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SV: SV: XML=WAP? And DOA?
    • From: Paul T <pault12@p...>

• References:
  • RE: SV: SV: XML=WAP? And DOA?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Xml is _not_ selfdescribing
• Next by Date: RE: taking XML seriously (was RE: XML=WAP? And DOA?)
• Previous by thread: RE: SV: SV: XML=WAP? And DOA?
• Next by thread: Re: SV: SV: XML=WAP? And DOA?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread