• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Xml is _not_ selfdescribing
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 14:03:54 -0500
• In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20020115185240.01aa0758@mailhost>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020115172829.02ce84d8@mailhost> <5.1.0.14.0.20020115185240.01aa0758@mailhost>

On Tuesday 15 January 2002 02:03 pm, John Aldridge wrote:
> Um, at the risk of provoking a philosophical discussion using long
> words which I won't understand :-)

That's the whole *point* of XML-DEV (almost left off the "-DEV" part 
of that ;-))

• References:
  • RE: Xml is _not_ selfdescribing
    • From: John Aldridge <john.aldridge@i...>
  • Re: Xml is _not_ selfdescribing
    • From: John Aldridge <john.aldridge@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Xml is _not_ selfdescribing
• Next by Date: Re: SV: SV: XML=WAP? And DOA?
• Previous by thread: Re: Xml is _not_ selfdescribing
• Next by thread: Re: Xml is _not_ selfdescribing
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread