• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 02:18:46 -0500
• In-reply-to: <3C50993F.729E73EA@p...>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306DF62FF@HQ5> <001501c1a526$648d0bb0$0100000a@nico> <3C50993F.729E73EA@p...>

On Thursday 24 January 2002 06:31 pm, Paul Prescod wrote:
> My personal take is that a lot of XML "semantics" is really about
> transformation from unknown vocabularies to known ones. This can be
> done in a sort of blunt way with XSLT 

This is a very practical viewpoint... XSLT is effectively used to 
hard-code the mapping, rather than dealing with the porblem if 
inferring a mapping.

The latter might well prove impossible for all practical purposes.

• References:
  • RE: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
    • From: "Nicolas Lehuen" <nicolas.lehuen@u...>
  • Re: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RE: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: There is a m eaning, but it's not in the data alone)
• Next by Date: Re: Re: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: [xml-dev ] There is a m eaning, but it's not in the data alone)
• Previous by thread: Re: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
• Next by thread: Re: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread