• To: 'Nicolas Lehuen' <nicolas.lehuen@u...>, 'Jeff Lowery' <jlowery@s...>
• Subject: RE: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 15:16:47 -0600
• Cc: xml-dev@l...

Newcomb's email has the clue.

Again, what is the difference in an arch form and a 
pile 'o attributes on the root?

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Nicolas Lehuen [mailto:nicolas.lehuen@u...]

> Why is this debate still being held every year?
> 
> len

New year's resolutions ?

• Follow-Ups:
  • AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
    • From: "Nicolas Lehuen" <nicolas.lehuen@u...>

• Prev by Date: RE: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• Next by Date: Re: Strategies for a lowly XML document
• Previous by thread: RE: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• Next by thread: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread