[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Client-side XSLT. Re: Bad News on IE6 XML Support

  • From: Paul Tchistopolskii <pault12@p...>
  • To: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 20:41:46 -0700

render xsl on client browser

> > So you call HTML a 'low level junk' 
> 
> If the semantic content of the message is within the scope of HTML 
> then HTML is fine.

The semantic content? I don't undertstand this. Really.
So you want to display something on some client (browser)?
What the heck is 'semantic content' ? Or maybe I don't 
understand what are you talking about?

> But for mathematics I want to use MathML. I can in simple (and even not
> so simple) then I can make something that _looks_ more or less like
> Mathematics by using css javascript and random font changes, but the
> MathML file is far more useful.

So you want to render some mathematics stuff, sending
something  like XSL FO ( just for Mathemathics ) ? Let's 
call the thing MathFO.

Now either the browser understands MathFO ( has a plugin 
of whatever ) or it *does*not*.

What is the critical role of client-side XSLT processing here?
Really? I (still) don't get it. I understand 'semantic content' 
sounds better than 'low-level junk', but I don't understand 
what particular problem you're trying to solve... What is the task?
To render MathFO in the browser that does not understand 
MathFO ??? How can client-side XSLT help you???
 
> > I think HTML was *very*good* idea.
> So do I. It was, and it still is.
> But many people saw the need for something else, in addition to HTML:
> A cut down "SGML for the Web"

I don't understand how is this relevant.
Many other people just want beer and have 
no clue about HTML or XML. 

> The initial promise as XML as a language for the web is not met if the
> XML is just a private internal format and the only thing thatgoes on teh
> web is a presentation oriented downtranslation of that information to
> HTML.

I think you're playing with words here. I still don't 
understand your idea about client-side XSLT and 
what particular problem you want to solve. 

All the arguments for "client-side XSLT" ( in the 
absence of scalable client-side FO ) are *very much*
questionable.

Rgds.Paul.




PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.