[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Client-side XSLT. Re: Bad News on IE6 XML Support

• From: Paul Tchistopolskii <pault12@p...>
• To: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2001 19:38:07 -0700

> Client side transformations allows you to send semantically rich
> accessable data which is transformed as late as possible to the
> rendering-only form. Server side transformation means you have to send
> low level junk down the wire.

So you call HTML a 'low level junk' ? Or maybe you call SVG 'low level junk' ?
OK, I don't understand why sending "low level junk down the wire" is bad.

Could you educate me, please. *Why* this 'late possible transform' 
*is*better*, than 'sending low-level junk down the wire' ?

Why sending, for example, HTML 'low-level junk' down the wire was/is 
*bad* idea? I think HTML was *very*good* idea.

I have more things to say, but I'd love to see some particular usecase.
If possible.

Rgds.Paul.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Client-side XSLT. Re: Bad News on IE6 XML Support
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • RE: Client-side XSLT. Re: Bad News on IE6 XML Support
    • From: Paul Spencer <paul.spencer@a...>

• References:
  • RE: Client-side XSLT. Re: Bad News on IE6 XML Support
    • From: Max Dunn <maxdunn@s...>
  • Re: Client-side XSLT. Re: Bad News on IE6 XML Support
    • From: Paul Tchistopolskii <pault12@p...>
  • Re: Client-side XSLT. Re: Bad News on IE6 XML Support
    • From: Jeni Tennison <mail@j...>
  • Re: Client-side XSLT. Re: Bad News on IE6 XML Support
    • From: Paul Tchistopolskii <pault12@p...>
  • Re: Client-side XSLT. Re: Bad News on IE6 XML Support
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>

• Prev by Date: RE: My last on IE6 and XML
• Next by Date: RE: Bad News on IE6 XML Support
• Previous by thread: Re: Client-side XSLT. Re: Bad News on IE6 XML Support
• Next by thread: Re: Client-side XSLT. Re: Bad News on IE6 XML Support
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread