[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Client-side XSLT. Re: Bad News on IE6 XML Support

• From: Bill Humphries <bill@w...>
• To: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>, Didier PH Martin <martind@n...>
• Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2001 17:50:53 -0700

On Sunday, September 9, 2001, at 04:44 PM, David Carlisle wrote:
>
>> Could somebody please show me a *single*benchmark* illustrating
>> that client-side XSLT load-balancing works and saves 'that much'.
>
> speed/load depends on all sorts of issues and isn't particularly
> interesting (well it is to some but...)

Of interest to this thread might be Tim Chester of Texas A&M University's 
article in the October 2001 Dr. Dobbs comparing the performance of ADO/ASP,
  XML/XSLT/ASP and cached XML/XSLT/ASP.

Chester found that while ADO/ASP out performed the XSLT architecture in 
terms of response time and throughput, the caching XSLT architecture 
significantly out-performed the ADO/ASP model.

The article is not on the Dr. Dobbs site, so you'll have to visit your 
friendly, independent technical bookseller.
----
Bill Humphries <bill@w...>
http://www.whump.com/moreLikeThis/

• References:
  • Re: Client-side XSLT. Re: Bad News on IE6 XML Support
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re :Bad News on IE6 XML Support
• Next by Date: Re: My last on IE6 and XML
• Previous by thread: Re: Client-side XSLT. Re: Bad News on IE6 XML Support
• Next by thread: Re: Client-side XSLT. Re: Bad News on IE6 XML Support
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread