[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)

• From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• To: xml-dev@l..., www-xml-blueberry-comments@w...
• Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 08:36:57 -0400

At 4:17 PM +0800 7/23/01, Rick Jelliffe wrote:

>Do Blueberry documents require a Blueberry DOM and
>Blueberry SAX handler?  (I.e., ones which ascertain what
>features are used.
>
>That is why I think forget a new version and just make it
>a fix for the new edition, pre-announced.
>

No, this is clearly a new version of XML. The second edition was the second edition of the *XML specification* but in no way changed the definition of the language. In a few cases, particularly language codes, some (not all) parsers had incorrectly interpreted some confusing parts of the specification. Thus their behavior changed under the 2nd edition. 

However, the fact remains: every document that was a well-formed XML 1.0 document was also a well-formed XML 1.0 2nd edition document. Every document that was not a well-formed XML 1.0 document was also not a well-formed XML 1.0 2nd edition document. Ditto for validity.

Blueberry would change the definition of the XML language, not just the specification. While  every document that is a well-formed XML 1.0 document will still be a well-formed Blueberry document, many documents that are not  well-formed XML 1.0 documents will be well-formed Blueberry documents. It would be a bad thing to try to sweep this change under the rug and pretend we always meant to do this. 
-- 

+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@m... | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ 
|          The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001)           |
|              http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/books/bible2/              |
|   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/   |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|  Read Cafe au Lait for Java News:  http://www.cafeaulait.org/      | 
|  Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/     |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
  • Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• References:
  • Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
  • Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
  • Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: ANNOUNCE: dom4j 0.7 released
• Next by Date: Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
• Previous by thread: Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
• Next by thread: Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread