[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)

  • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
  • To: John Cowan <cowan@m...>, Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
  • Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 00:02:11 -0400

Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
At 10:59 PM 7/22/2001 -0400, John Cowan wrote:

>We are not talking about not labelling.  The issue is: should a document
>labelled Blueberry be required to actually exploit at least one Blueberry
>feature, or is it all right to take a well-formed XML 1.0 document
>and label it Blueberry without further change?

Why wouldn't it be ok?

Any intersection between the sets of well-formed XML 1.0 documents and XML 
"Blueberry" documents can be labelled as one or the other, or both (just as 
a valid document can also be labelled well-formed -- that particular 
intersection is not mutually exclusive).



Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.

Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.