Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
At 10:59 PM 7/22/2001 -0400, John Cowan wrote: >We are not talking about not labelling. The issue is: should a document >labelled Blueberry be required to actually exploit at least one Blueberry >feature, or is it all right to take a well-formed XML 1.0 document >and label it Blueberry without further change? Why wouldn't it be ok? Any intersection between the sets of well-formed XML 1.0 documents and XML "Blueberry" documents can be labelled as one or the other, or both (just as a valid document can also be labelled well-formed -- that particular intersection is not mutually exclusive). Ann
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format