Re: XML Blueberry (non-ASCII name characters in Japan)
Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: > A different decision was made for name characters. There it was > decided that these would be based on Unicode 2.0, and that code > points which might be assigned in the future would not be allowed > as name characters. I think that was the *effect* of the decision, but not actually the decision itself. > I'm not sure that decision was right, but I > don't think a convincing argument for revisiting it now has been > made yet. Please tell me what kind of argument you would find convincing. > Even if > Unicode did something as radical as shuffling the code points for > the different characters, that wouldn't mean that XML had to > change. Which Unicode would never do. -- There is / one art || John Cowan <jcowan@r...> no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format