[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)

• From: jackson <jackson@d...>
• To: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 17:02:41 +1000

Tim Bray wrote:
> Er, is anyone in the Java language team on top of what
> Unicode's up to?  This is a real problem.

I haven't had time to follow this discussion as closely as i would like,
but i've dipped into it from time to time.

Tim has raised a couple of Java issues in recent mails.

A possibly relevant paper from Sun people (no final answer):

  http://www.unicode.org/iuc/iuc16/b17/paper.pdf

As i remember it, it is an interesting discussion, but basically no
answer as yet. Still, it seems they are aware.

And Tim is right - it does seem to be a real problem.

David Jackson

• References:
  • Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
  • Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
  • Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
• Next by Date: XML referencing (was Re: Blueberry is not "closed")
• Previous by thread: Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
• Next by thread: Re: Blueberry is not "closed"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread