[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • To: Peter Jacobi <pj@w...>
  • Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 16:45:30 -0400

Peter Jacobi wrote:


> I assume it amounts to one additional numeric code per Unicode 
> character, which even can get into the next revision of the 
> main Unicode Character Database itself.


Not even that, just a few rules for deducing name and name-start
status from the existing fields, plus a very small backward
compatibility table for Unicode 2.0 cruft.

 

In fact, the UCD itself is not be extended any more; instead,
Unicode creates subsidiary tables such as Asian Width.

-- 
There is / one art             || John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
no more / no less              || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things             || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness           \\ -- Piet Hein


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member