• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• To: Peter Jacobi <pj@w...>
• Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 16:45:23 -0400

Peter Jacobi wrote:


> I assume it amounts to one additional numeric code per Unicode 
> character, which even can get into the next revision of the 
> main Unicode Character Database itself.


Not even that, just a few rules for deducing name and name-start
status from the existing fields, plus a very small backward
compatibility table for Unicode 2.0 cruft.

 

In fact, the UCD itself is not be extended any more; instead,
Unicode creates subsidiary tables such as Asian Width.

-- 
There is / one art             || John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
no more / no less              || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things             || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness           \\ -- Piet Hein

• References:
  • Re: XML Blueberry
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • Re: XML Blueberry
    • From: Peter Jacobi <pj@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML Blueberry
• Next by Date: Re: XML Blueberry
• Previous by thread: Re: XML Blueberry
• Next by thread: Re: XML Blueberry
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread