• From: james anderson <james.anderson@s...>
• To: xml-editor@w...
• Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 20:50:12 +0200

During conformance tests I observed that numerous test cases include
system identifiers which are not valid URI references. Yet the documents
are categorized as valid. The recommendation sets constraints on syntax
and interpretation of those references which _are_ URI references, but
this reader could find no stipulation, that those system literals which
_are not_ valid URI references are thereby in error. Is this intended?

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML 1.0 Conformance Test Results
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
  • Re: XML 1.0 Conformance Test Results
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• References:
  • XML 1.0 Conformance Test Results
    • From: Rob Lugt <roblugt@e...>
  • Re: XML 1.0 Conformance Test Results
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Copyrighting schemas, Hailstorm (strayed a bit)
• Next by Date: Re: Copyrighting schemas, Hailstorm (strayed a bit)
• Previous by thread: Re: XML 1.0 Conformance Test Results
• Next by thread: Re: XML 1.0 Conformance Test Results
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread