• From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
• To: james.anderson@s..., xml-editor@w...
• Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 11:58:37 -0700

> During conformance tests I observed that numerous test cases include
> system identifiers which are not valid URI references. 

Which test cases were those?

>    Yet the documents
> are categorized as valid. The recommendation sets constraints on syntax
> and interpretation of those references which _are_ URI references, but
> this reader could find no stipulation, that those system literals which
> _are not_ valid URI references are thereby in error. Is this intended?

• References:
  • XML 1.0 Conformance Test Results
    • From: Rob Lugt <roblugt@e...>
  • Re: XML 1.0 Conformance Test Results
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
  • Re: XML 1.0 Conformance Test Results
    • From: james anderson <james.anderson@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Copyrighting schemas, Hailstorm (strayed a bit)
• Next by Date: Re: XML 1.0 Conformance Test Results
• Previous by thread: Re: XML 1.0 Conformance Test Results
• Next by thread: Re: XML 1.0 Conformance Test Results
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread