• From: Vincent-Olivier Arsenault <vincent@n...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 16:51:05 -0400

At 04:04 PM 6/21/01, you wrote:
>Simon St.Laurent wrote:
>
>
>>It almost feels to me like those tables should be the responsibility of
>>the Unicode folks (or some similarly lucky but separate intermediary
>>with time on its hands) to maintain, and that some means of
>>incorporating them by reference might have avoided this entire
>>discussion.
>
>
>In essence they are:  Unicode sets the character properties, and
>XML has rules saying which types of characters can be used for what,
>and what the exceptions are.

Well mmm, not enough I'd say : why is there a need for so many character 
classes and DERIVATION rules (http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#CharClasses)?

v

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML Blueberry
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• References:
  • XML Blueberry
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: XML Blueberry
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
  • Re: XML Blueberry
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • Re: XML Blueberry
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: XML Blueberry
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XML Blueberry
• Next by Date: Re: XML Blueberry
• Previous by thread: Re: XML Blueberry
• Next by thread: Re: XML Blueberry
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread