• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• To: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 15:04:10 -0400

Uche Ogbuji wrote:


> Since the last I checked, the XML community is not the respectable arbiter
> of word usage,


There is none.

> I shall personally continue to use "schemata" as the plural
> of "schema", and continue to argue that others should do so.


By all means.  That is the Way of the English language, where
orthography (or in this case, morphology) evolves by a Hartree-Fock
iterative process (consult your local physicist).

-- 
There is / one art             || John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
no more / no less              || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things             || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness           \\ -- Piet Hein

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [OT] The stigma of schema
    • From: Rod Davison <rdavison@s...>
  • Re: [OT] The stigma of schema
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>

• References:
  • [OT] The stigma of schema
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SchemaTA (was: Newbie)
• Next by Date: RE: XML and SGML
• Previous by thread: [OT] The stigma of schema
• Next by thread: Re: [OT] The stigma of schema
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread