• From: Rod Davison <rdavison@s...>
• To: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>,Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 15:38:29 -0400

The processification of wording, while having intererstingness, outscopes the 
goalhood of xml-deving.

Rod

On Thursday 28 June 2001 03:04 pm, John Cowan wrote:
> Uche Ogbuji wrote:
> > Since the last I checked, the XML community is not the respectable
> > arbiter of word usage,
>
> There is none.
>
> > I shall personally continue to use "schemata" as the plural
> > of "schema", and continue to argue that others should do so.
>
> By all means.  That is the Way of the English language, where
> orthography (or in this case, morphology) evolves by a Hartree-Fock
> iterative process (consult your local physicist).

• References:
  • [OT] The stigma of schema
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
  • Re: [OT] The stigma of schema
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Against the Grain: Pascal commentary about XML and databases
• Next by Date: RE: [OT] The stigma of schema
• Previous by thread: Re: [OT] The stigma of schema
• Next by thread: Re: [OT] The stigma of schema
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread