• From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
• To: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>, Rob Lugt <roblugt@e...>,xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 13:09:55 -0700

> Yes, to be clear, and for reasons including this, but also for other
> reasons, SAX needs to have a standard way to communicate the base URI to an
> application.

The Locator is solving that problem already ... unfortunately
it's allegedly "optional" (though I seem to recall that almost
all SAX parsers handle it).

Better IMO to use the existing mechanism rather than define
a new one that's less general.

• References:
  • RE: SAX 2.0 Enhancement proposal (2nd Ed)
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
  • Re: SAX 2.0 Enhancement proposal (2nd Ed)
    • From: Rob Lugt <roblugt@e...>
  • SAX 2.0 baseURI property was: Re: SAX 2.0 Enhancement proposal (2nd Ed)
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX 2.0 enhancement proposal
• Next by Date: Re: SAX 2.0 baseURI property was: Re: SAX 2.0 Enhancement proposal(2nd Ed)
• Previous by thread: SAX 2.0 baseURI property was: Re: SAX 2.0 Enhancement proposal (2nd Ed)
• Next by thread: Re: SAX 2.0 baseURI property was: Re: SAX 2.0 Enhancement proposal(2nd Ed)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread