Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Simon St.Laurent wrote: > > I can't imagine how that passage translates to "the relative URIs can > mean whatever the particular application wants them to mean." I read > that as leaving room for xml:base or a processing instruction which has > similar effect, though I suppose you could be really really really > liberal in your interpretation and get to "whatever the particular > application wants them to mean." What I wrote was a bit extreme! The lengths we'll go to to make a point! The point I wanted to make is that the spec opens the door for other interpretations. I'm certainly not advocating any interpretation other than the normal case in XML 1.0, but I am keen for the information to be made available for others to access when required. Regards Rob --- Rob Lugt ElCel Technology http://www.elcel.com/
|
