• From: Jonathan Robie <Jonathan.Robie@S...>
• To: www-ql@w..., xmldb@x..., xml-dev@l...
• Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 10:02:24 -0400

Michael Dyck wrote:

>Also, in the Use Case document,
>some of the 'Solutions in XQuery' appear to assume a different set of
>precedence rules, but it's not clear whether the Solutions or the
>grammar is at fault.

The XQuery document defines the language. The use case solutions that do 
not correspond to that definition are incorrect. Michael has pointed out a 
number of errors in the use cases, these will be corrected in the next 
Working Draft.

Jonathan

• Prev by Date: RE: First Order Logic and Semantic Web RE: NPR, Godel, Semantic W eb
• Next by Date: Re: avoiding XML code in viewsource
• Previous by thread: Re: [ANN] XQuery prototype
• Next by thread: RE: [ANN] XQuery prototype
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread