• From: Michael Dyck <MichaelDyck@h...>
• To: Michael Rys <mrys@m...>
• Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 20:26:39 -0700

Michael Rys wrote:
> 
> the February's working drafts normative grammar was - umh - rather buggy

What bugs did you find? Certainly, the BNF is ambiguous, but the subsequent
precedence rules take care of most of that. Also, in the Use Case document,
some of the 'Solutions in XQuery' appear to assume a different set of
precedence rules, but it's not clear whether the Solutions or the grammar is
at fault.

-Michael Dyck

• References:
  • RE: [ANN] XQuery prototype
    • From: Michael Rys <mrys@m...>

• Prev by Date: loadXMl() with NS6
• Next by Date: Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices
• Previous by thread: RE: [ANN] XQuery prototype
• Next by thread: RE: [ANN] XQuery prototype
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread