• From: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@a...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 07:39:25 -0600

At 2001-05-07 21:29, C. M. Sperberg-McQueen wrote:
>In sum, we appear to be in emphatic agreement.  If one is willing to
>change the rules for interpreting DTDs and validating documents
>against them, one can use DTD notation to define sets of documents
>which use namespaces.  Otherwise, not.

For "Otherwise, not" read "Otherwise, only with restrictions
on the use of namespace prefixes."  Sorry; I was tired.

C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

• References:
  • Re: DTDs and namespaces (was: using namespaces to version)
    • From: james anderson <james.anderson@s...>
  • Re: using namespaces to version
    • From: Warren Hedley <w.hedley@a...>
  • using namespaces to version
    • From: Warren Hedley <w.hedley@a...>
  • Re: using namespaces to version
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Re: using namespaces to version
    • From: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@a...>
  • DTDs and namespaces (was: using namespaces to version)
    • From: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@a...>
  • Re: DTDs and namespaces (was: using namespaces to version)
    • From: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: URN resolution
• Next by Date: RE: NPR, Godel, Semantic Web
• Previous by thread: Re: DTDs and namespaces (was: using namespaces to version)
• Next by thread: Re: using namespaces to version
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread