• From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Mon, 07 May 2001 18:20:07 -0400

/ james anderson <james.anderson@s...> was heard to say:
| This is just a side point, but DTD's do contain sufficient information
| to "support namespaces in their full generality". Note please an earlier
| message in this thread (http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200105/msg00112.html).
| 
| It is possible to propagate namespace constraints within a DTD according
| to rules analogous to those which the namespace recommendation specified
| for names within the document entity so long as the same literal
| qualified name does not appear more than once in the same external
| entity. It is conceivable to establish scoping rules which would cover
| those cases as well, but that does not seem necessary.

In fact a simple PI could be added to express the mapping and I think
it could be made to work fairly easily.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman.Walsh@S...   | It would not be better if things happened to
XML Standards Engineer | men just as they wished.--Heraclitus
Technology Dev. Group  | 
Sun Microsystems, Inc. | 

• References:
  • Re: using namespaces to version
    • From: Warren Hedley <w.hedley@a...>
  • using namespaces to version
    • From: Warren Hedley <w.hedley@a...>
  • Re: using namespaces to version
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Re: using namespaces to version
    • From: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@a...>
  • Re: using namespaces to version
    • From: james anderson <james.anderson@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: The lists I monitor
• Next by Date: Re: The lists I monitor
• Previous by thread: Re: DTDs and namespaces (was: using namespaces to version)
• Next by thread: Re: using namespaces to version
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread