• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: Murali Mani <mani@C...>
• Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 12:10:50 -0500

I understand.  We read a lot.  I am also conversant 
with the opinions.  But process being the thing, 
XML Schemas is out the door and TimBL signed off 
on it.  That means the name game is done.  The authority 
of note has signed it.   Now is the time to get on 
to using it.

This doesn't invalidate work done by others on other 
approaches or say they should stop working, or feedback 
to the next version of XML Schemas is suspended.  Of 
course not.  It means it is out there.  Software can 
be written to it and documents can cite it.  It won't 
change soon.  Get your requests for the next version 
ready and submitted.  IOW, it IS a game and we have 
to play by rules or go to another game.

Len 
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: A few things I noticed about w3c's xml-schema
    • From: Murali Mani <mani@C...>

• Prev by Date: Re: meta-specs
• Next by Date: Re: meta-specs (was RE: A few things I noticed about w3c's xml-schema)
• Previous by thread: Re: meta-specs
• Next by thread: RE: A few things I noticed about w3c's xml-schema
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread