Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Yes, TBL has signed it. With such a strong belief about where Xml-schema fits, i think i will be doing myself injustice and waste my resources if i start using it. In stead, i will rather work on what i feel is the correct way of doing things, and hopefully when we resolve issues there, it will be good enough for the consideration of the schema WG and the research community. Also hopefully we will be able to do this before lot of money is spent on trying to fix XML-Schema. regards - murali. On Wed, 30 May 2001, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote: > I understand. We read a lot. I am also conversant > with the opinions. But process being the thing, > XML Schemas is out the door and TimBL signed off > on it. That means the name game is done. The authority > of note has signed it. Now is the time to get on > to using it. > > This doesn't invalidate work done by others on other > approaches or say they should stop working, or feedback > to the next version of XML Schemas is suspended. Of > course not. It means it is out there. Software can > be written to it and documents can cite it. It won't > change soon. Get your requests for the next version > ready and submitted. IOW, it IS a game and we have > to play by rules or go to another game. > > Len > http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard > > Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti. > Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org, an initiative of OASIS > <http://www.oasis-open.org> > > The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > > To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word > "unsubscribe" in the body to: xml-dev-request@l... >
|
