• From: Simon Fell <xml@z...>
• To: Eric Chiu <echiu@i...>
• Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 23:21:21 -0700

certainly wouldn't claim to be an expert, but IIRC, UDDI uses SOAP,
but has its own encoding style, it doesn't use the standard section 5
SOAP encoding.

Cheers
Simon
www.pocketsoap.com

On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 10:53:00 -0500, in xml you wrote:

>ebXML recently adapted SOAP into the Messaging Specification, 
>which encompasses a set of services and protocols that allow an 
>electronic business client to request services from electronic business 
>servers over any application-level transport protocol, including SMTP, HTTP 
>and others. ebXML defines a general-purpose message, with a header that 
>supports multiple payloads, while allowing digital signatures within and among 
>related messages. Although the header is XML, the body of the message 
>may be XML, MIME, etc
>
>http://www.ebxml.org/news/pr_20010308.htm
>http://www.ebxml.org/news/pr_20010222.htm
>
>A similar proposal is underway to use the UDDI business registry 
>to search for an ebXML Registry/Repository. 
>
>Anyone with UDDI expertise care to comment?
>
>Eric Chiu

• References:
  • ebXML adapt SOAP, is UDDI next?
    • From: Eric Chiu <echiu@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Can XML Schemas Support Document Systems (WAS RE: ZDNet Schemaarticle,and hiding complexity within user-friendly products)
• Next by Date: Re: Seeking lURNed advice on UDDI
• Previous by thread: ebXML adapt SOAP, is UDDI next?
• Next by thread: xml-arch?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread