• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2001 15:35:00 -0700

At 06:26 PM 07/04/01 -0400, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
>I think that one of the ongoing mysteries of URI processing is the lack of 
>a concept of equivalence.
>
>This fueled the relative URI namespace debate last year, and continues to 
>raise new problems at every opportunity.

Really?  It doesn't seem to have stopped the Web technologies from
turning the world inside out.  Maybe I'm simple-minded, but the
equivalence rules from the RFCs have never really gotten in my
way in practical terms.  Can we hear about some of these new 
problems? -Tim

• References:
  • Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me understand, please
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
  • RE: Linkbases, Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me understand, please
    • From: Michael Champion <mike.champion@s...>
  • Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me understand, please
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: "Binary XML" proposals
• Next by Date: RE: "Binary XML" proposals
• Previous by thread: Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me understand, please
• Next by thread: RE: Linkbases, Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me understand, please
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread