• From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@s...>
• To: Wayne Steele <xmlmaster@h...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 15:52:59 -0500

Wayne Steele <xmlmaster@h...> wrote:

> Supplement this with some agreeable algorthims, for instance that
> "http://example.org/doc#foo" is equivalent to
> "http://example.org/doc#xpointer(foo)", and I think a pretty good 80/20
> point for URI identity can be reached.
> 
> But RDF is the problem, because it has a "special" way of looking at URIs.

What is this "special" way? It would be fine for your RDF-based system to
understand XPointer and canonicalize URIs. What's the problem with RDF here?

-- 
[ Aaron Swartz | me@a... | http://www.aaronsw.com ]

• References:
  • RDF and URIs (was Re: Modularity, et al.)
    • From: Wayne Steele <xmlmaster@h...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Request for Comments: XML binary encoding
• Next by Date: Re: XML Parsers for UNIX environments
• Previous by thread: RDF and URIs (was Re: Modularity, et al.)
• Next by thread: Uncomplicating IT: Simpler Said Than Done
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread