• From: Didier PH Martin <martind@n...>
• To: uche.ogbuji@f..., xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2001 13:38:36 -0400

HI Ouche,

Ouche said:
Your "But" makes me thing you're drawing a comparison, but I don't know
what or whom to.  If you refer to me: I've pointed out that
I've also spent a while exploring  XTM and trying to find what "summum
bonum" I can from RDF, XTM and other non XML-ish things such as
conceptual graphs.  In the time I was able, my determination was that RDF
covered my needs best.

So I probably haven't spent as much time as Eric looking to find a better
truth, but I hope you understand that I haven't just been stubbornly
sticking to one technology.  I'm not sure I'm capable of such a thing.

Didier replies:
Far way from me that thought! I meant with the "but", not a comparison, only
an emphasis, something that stands in front of. Sorry, if this was
ambiguous.

cheers
Didier PH Martin

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps, and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• References:
  • Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps, and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me
    • From: uche.ogbuji@f...

• Prev by Date: Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps, and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me
• Next by Date: Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me understand, please
• Previous by thread: Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps, and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me
• Next by thread: Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps, and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread