[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Web Philosophy

• From: Danny Ayers <danny@p...>
• To: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 01:02:12 +0600

Ok, fair enough, that's a lot less - but not insignificant to most mortals.
How is the figure justified?

Anyway, so you will only pay me $5,000 to start working for me. Still sounds
a good deal.

---
Danny Ayers
http://www.isacat.net

<- -----Original Message-----
<- From: Ann Navarro [mailto:ann@w...]
<- Sent: 28 March 2001 00:57
<- To: Danny Ayers; xml-dev@l...
<- Subject: RE: Web Philosophy
<-
<-
<- At 12:55 PM 3/27/01, Danny Ayers wrote:
<- >Doesn't this appear strange - considering that usually when you
<- do work for
<- >people you get paid. As to the level of the membership fee - I can only
<- >think that this is intentionaly high, to block the little fish out. Full
<- >membership for a years salary? Come on.
<-
<- Woah, back up folks.
<-
<- $50,000 annual membership is for companies with gross receipts
<- over $5MM or
<- something absurd. Otherwise, it's $5,000 annual. There are far
<- more of the
<- small guys than the big guys in the consortium.
<-
<- Plus, to dispell any notions to the contrary, the only difference is the
<- amount paid, no difference in voting rights, representation, or anything
<- else by charter.
<-
<- Ann
<- Chief Geek, WebGeek Inc.
<- http://www.webgeek.com/
<- Now in print! XHTML By Example
<- http://www.webgeek.com/books/
<- What's on my mind? http://www.snorf.net/blog/
<-

• References:
  • RE: Web Philosophy
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Web Philosophy
• Next by Date: Re: Web Philosophy
• Previous by thread: RE: Web Philosophy
• Next by thread: Re: Web Philosophy
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread