Re: an xsl/xpath question re attribute qualifiers
thanks. I was, and remain somewhat, confused by the analogies and differences in the respective grammars in REC-xslt-19991116 and REC-xpath-19991116. I mistook the XSLT (Pattern , LocationPathPattern, ...) formulation for XPath's ( LocationPath , (AbsoluteLocationPath | RelativeLocationPath ) )... I surmise I should understand it to be more like XPath's (UnionExpr, PathExpr, ...). Is that correct? David Carlisle wrote: > > > 2a. For example, I am wondering how something like the id and key > > anchors from the xslt description best fit into the xpath grammar. > > id() and key() are XPath functions added to the XPath initial context by > Xpath and XSLT respectively. So you don't need to change the grammar for > them: they match the production FunctionCall from the XPath spec. >
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format