[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: an xsl/xpath question re attribute qualifiers

• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• To: james.anderson@a...
• Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 13:18:21 +0000 (GMT)

> 2a. For example, I am wondering how something like the id and key
> anchors from the xslt description best fit into the xpath grammar.

id() and key() are XPath functions added to the XPath initial context by
Xpath and XSLT respectively. So you don't need to change the grammar for
them: they match the production FunctionCall from the XPath spec.

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit
http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: an xsl/xpath question re attribute qualifiers
    • From: james anderson <james.anderson@a...>

• References:
  • an xsl/xpath question re attribute qualifiers
    • From: james anderson <james.anderson@a...>

• Prev by Date: How Big is XML?
• Next by Date: Re: an xslt question re modeling namespaces
• Previous by thread: an xsl/xpath question re attribute qualifiers
• Next by thread: Re: an xsl/xpath question re attribute qualifiers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread