[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: The relentless march of abstraction (fwd)

• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: Dave Winer <dave@u...>, Robin Berjon <robin@k...>,David Megginson <david@m...>
• Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 14:20:53 -0600

To save some noshing on Google bandwidth:

Mishegas:  craziness

http://www.koshernosh.com/in-ameri.htm

Len 
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Winer [mailto:dave@u...]

To be clear, I am being misquoted. I did not say, nor do I believe that XML
should follow that rule. I believe parsers should be very strict. Otherwise
it's all mishegas. Dave

• Prev by Date: Re: The relentless march of abstraction (fwd)
• Next by Date: Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices
• Previous by thread: RE: The relentless march of abstraction (fwd)
• Next by thread: RE: The relentless march of abstraction (fwd)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread